The coalition Georgian Dream applied to NGOs, stating that Tbilisi City Hall refused to provide it with adequate time for installing a stage for a large-scale demonstration on Freedom Square in Tbilisi on May 27. Video footage of a conversation between the Georgian Dream representatives and Tbilisi City Hall shows that Tbilisi City Hall cited anticipated disruption of traffic as grounds for the refusal. More specifically, the city Hall's representative believes that installment of a stage together with corresponding equipment on Freedom Square prior to the demonstration may disrupt traffic, which amounts to artificial blocking of traffic under the Law of Georgia on Assemblies and Manifestations and would be deemed as unlawful. However, representatives of the Georgian Dream maintain that works for installment of the stage will not result in full blockage of the carriageway.
The below signatory NGOs clarify that in compliance with the universal principles of assemblies and demonstrations, the state is not only prohibited from interfering with the freedom of assembly but it is also obligated to take all measures necessary to facilitate exercising of this right.
Under the first clause in paragraph 4, Article 111 of the Law of Georgia on Assembly and Manifestation, "Blockage of a carriageway is prohibited, unless necessitated by the number of participants of an assembly or a demonstration". The stipulation "unless necessitated by the number of participants of an assembly or a demonstration" must be broadly interpreted. More specifically, when holding a demonstration in a due manner requires certain technical equipment that must be installed prior to the demonstration and it is impossible to do so without blockage of a carriageway, such action must be viewed as blockage of a carriageway “necessitated by the number of participants of an assembly or a demonstration”. Otherwise, it would be impossible to hold a demonstration in a due manner, which will result in violation of the right guaranteed by Article 25 of the Constitution. As for the second clause in paragraph 4, Article 111 of the Law, prohibiting “blockage of a carriageway by automobiles, various constructions and/or items,” this provision must be narrowly interpreted and applied solely to cases when a carriageway is blocked by automobiles, various constructions and/or items intentionally, as opposed to the need to organize a demonstration in a due manner. Any other interpretation of the provision makes it impossible to organize a large-scale event which is impossible to hold without technical equipment (installment of stage, audio or visual amplifiers, etc.).